NodeSet
  • NodeSet Documentation
  • NodeSet
    • Introduction
    • Infrastructure Powered by NodeSet
    • Security Notice
  • Node Operators
    • Applications
    • Node Operator Policies
    • Client Diversity Policy
    • Best Practices
      • Terminology
      • Planning Your Node Architecture
      • MEV Boost
    • Hyperdrive
      • Installation
      • Configuration
      • Updating
      • Monitoring Your Node
      • Uninstallation
      • Disaster Recovery and Node Migration
      • Public Betas
    • FAQ
  • StakeWise Integration
    • Introduction
    • What's New in v1.2
    • FAQ
    • Node Operator Guide
      • Monitoring the StakeWise Module
      • Key Recovery
      • How it Works
    • Security Information
  • Constellation
    • Overview
    • xrETH
    • xRPL
    • Constellation vs Others
    • Risks and Mitigations
    • Node Operators
    • Node Operator Guide
      • Overview
      • Prerequisites
      • Registering your Node with Constellation
      • Creating and Running Minipools
      • Rewards Algorithm
    • Administrator
    • Treasurer
    • FAQ
    • Security Information
  • NodeSet Dashboard
    • Introduction
    • Authorizing Your Node
    • Security Information
Powered by GitBook
On this page
  • LST Comparison
  • Constellation vs Running a Node
  1. Constellation

Constellation vs Others

Understand the differences in risks, returns, and responsibilities

PreviousxRPLNextRisks and Mitigations

Last updated 3 months ago

LST Comparison

Token
Fee on Ethereum Rewards
Pros
Cons

xrETH (NodeSet)

0%

No fee, high decentralization

See

osETH

5%+ (depends on chosen vault, network average otherwise)

Slashing protection, some decentralization

Complex UX, minimum fee sacrifices decentralization

stETH

10%

High liquidity depth

Highly centralized, higher fees, no slashing protection

rETH

14%

Slashing protection, high decentralization

High fee

Constellation vs Running a Node

Most xrETH depositors can expect similar returns and lower risks compared to running a basic Ethereum node (AKA "solo staking") on your own. In addition, xrETH is a liquid token, which allows for its usage in DeFi, boosting its potential even further.

When comparing to other node operation options, the landscape is more complex. Generally, using xrETH as a Constellation Node Operator allows for improved returns and full liquidity, and other solutions are available for users that wishing to maximize returns even at the cost of liquidity or utility.

Method
Estimated Returns*
Pros
Cons

xrETH (NodeSet)

100% of solo staking

Usable in DeFi, which may boost returns dramatically

See

xrETH + Constellation Node Operation (NodeSet)

121% of solo staking

Usable in DeFi, which may boost returns dramatically

See

Solo staking

100% of solo staking

No SC risk

Fully locked, must run a node, risk and returns dependent upon individual performance

Rocket Pool (LEB8)

ETH: 130-142% of solo staking RPL: ~6% APR

Higher returns than solo staking

Fully locked, must run a node, risk and returns dependent upon individual performance

Lido CSM

237% of solo staking

Highest returns

Fully locked, must run a node, risk and returns dependent upon individual performance Limited to 16 ETH

*Estimated Returns are sourced from external data and are not guaranteed. NodeSet is not responsible for the creation of or any inaccuracy in this data.

Risks and Mitigations
Risks and Mitigations
Risks and Mitigations